Showing posts with label basics of quantum mechanics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label basics of quantum mechanics. Show all posts

Saturday, April 16, 2011

The Great Debate of the Nature of Reality


Edinburgh this week is a very interesting place to be at, due to the famous international science festival. This science festival in short is two weeks of pure fun for science fans. It has everything, starting with talks by famous scientists and writers, events for kids, screenings of Brian Cox's newest film, talk by Richard Dawkins and so much more.



If you have the chance to visit Edinburgh during the festival I highly recommend it. You can find all the needed information at the following link.

But why am talking about this festival? Well, simply I had a chance to visit some great talks. One of them was by Manjit Kumar, a scientist and a philosopher, who is the author of the new book "Quantum - Einstein, Bohr and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality".



It was a great talk, which involved a lot of historical facts and amazing pictures. Needless to say it involved a lot explanations about the discoveries of quantum mechanics. The most interesting part was about the famous Einstein and Bohr debates regarding the interpretation of quantum mechanics.



So without spoiling the fun I can say that it was a great talk and it's an even greater book, so don't hesitate and buy it as it's really cheap. I especially recommend it for all of you science history lovers.

PS:  the author of the book has a very nice blog, which can be found here.

Also you can buy the book here:


Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Basics of Quantum Mechanics Lesson 3


So last time we looked at the corner stone of Quantum Mechanics - Schrodinger equation:



* Note it's a simplified version for 1 dimension.

This time we're gonna look at some simple solutions of this equation, which will show us how microscopic particles behave.

So let's start by simplifying Schrodinger equation for a case of a free moving particle. Since the zero of potential is an arbitrary choice we choose to make U0 = 0. This gives:
(1)


Also it is useful for our solution to express the energy E in terms of momentum p (where Ek= (mv^2)/2 & p=mv), which gives:


 (2)


Substituting (2) into (1) gives:




This can be simplified further using De Broglie's wavelenght (something we covered last time: p=h/lambda) and defining a quantity called wave number k: k= 2pi/lambda:


( Schrodinger equation for a free moving particle)


So how can we solve this equation? We'll it's not a trivial process, and it doesn't really matter for learning the basics, so let's skip to the answer:


(where A is some constant, e is the exponential function, i is the square root of -1 from complex numbers, k is the wave number)


Note that this is a time-independent solution. The time dependence of the wave function comes from solving the time dependent Schrodinger equation, which gives:

So ok, we solved the SE for a free moving particle and found the wave function, but what does it tell us about the particle? Don't worry we're gonna look at it next time. Thanks for reading!


LINK to lesson 1
LINK to lesson 2

Sunday, March 6, 2011

What is Reality ??


Hey, I found this great BBC documentary called "What is Reality?". It's about the various theories and experiments of physics which could help to answer this question. It involves a lot of great stuff about quantum mechanics (for example the famous double-slit experiment), particle physics and some cosmology.

I really like that it illustrated the whole bizarre side of quantum mechanics and the way it changes our understanding of reality. So check this out here or on YouTube. Thanks for reading!







PS. do any of you guys know how to write eqautions in Blogger? I would appreciate if you'd share this knowledge ;]

Friday, February 25, 2011

Basics of Quantum Mechanics Lesson 2


Last time we looked at one of the most important principles of the quantum mechanics - Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This time, we're gonna try to understand more about the micro world by analysing one of the most famous experiments - double slit experiment. Also we're gonna find out what a wave function is and how it helps to analyse the micro world.

The idea behind the double slit experiment is dead simple - a wave of light (works also for water & sound) is sent through a screen with two slits. If the size of the slits is correct (has to be comparable with the wave length of the light waves) two parts of the wave interfere with each other, creating an interference pattern on the screen. Diagram below illustrates the setup of the experiment, as well as the real view of the interference pattern in b).





So there's nothing particularly shocking about this. It's not hard to see water waves interfering in everyday life. However, there was a shocking surprise that scientists stumbled upon when using the same experimental setup with particles! But before finding out what this shocking surprise was let's think what would happen if you would try experimenting with this double slit setup while using particles. For the sake of simplicity let's imagine that our particles are like tennis balls. Let's assume you have to hit a wall with a tennis ball through a screen of two big slits. After throwing a dozen or more balls you would observe a pattern similar to this:

Once again - nothing shocking here. So after this "experiment" let's switch to the microscopic world and try the same thing with microscopic particles, let us say electrons. Of course, by using common sense, everyday experience and all your tennis knowledge you might guess that we might get the same pattern. But what we actually get is one of the most shocking discoveries of modern physics:





Yes, we get an interference pattern like in the case of waves. Now, after scratching your head for a while, you might say that this must be because a bunch of electrons interfere like waves while travelling to the screen. This is a perfectly reasonable assumption. So let's test it. Let's try sending a single electron through the slits, that way it won't interfere with anything and using common sense once again it shouldn't form an interference pattern. Hey but quantum mechanics wouldn't be quantum mechanics if that was the case would it? What we actually get is another bizarre thing. If we send electrons one by one, at first no interference pattern is visible, but eventually an interference pattern appears! Now this is really strange, using common sense (well at least in a classical physics point of view) the electron can't go through both slits at the same time and interfere with itself. So something strange has to be going on.

Naturally scientists were also shocked so they decided to find out, which slit the electron goes through. So guess what happen then. Well when they tried to observe the electron, no interference pattern appeared! Now once again this is very strange. It's actually connected to the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - when you send a photon to collide with an electron (observing the electron) you change it's momentum. But we'll look at that  later.

So what conclusions can we draw from all of this. Well firstly, it is clear that rules of classical physics break down when it comes to the microscopic world. Secondly, particles in the microscopic world seem to have wave-like properties. And finally, due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, we can't be totally sure of a position and momentum of a particle. So due to these conclusions it is clear that if there was a theory that described the microscopic particles it had to describe particles with wave-like properties and would have to use Heisenberg's principle. And that theory of course is quantum mechanics. So let's look at two corner stones of quantum mechanics - Schrodinger equation and wave functions.

Now if you remember your high school days (or if you are in high school), you might recall that one equation called Newton's 2nd law was highly important. Almost all of the most important laws and equations in mechanics can be derived from or using the famous equation F=ma. For instance equations of constant acceleration motion ( s(t)=Vot +(-) (at^2)/2) can be derived using Newton's 2nd law. Furthermore simple wave equations can also be derived using the same equation. So natural question would be - is there a way to derive a equation, would tell us where to find a particle at a given time t in quantum mechanics?

The answer is yes! This equation is called the wave function. It is noted with a Greek letter psi. What does the wave function do? The answer is that it helps you to find out how likely it is to find a particle in a given place at a given time (actually it is the probability density function that does this, but the p.d.f is just the squared absolute value of the wave function).
The notation of the wave function (time independent):


An example of a graph showing the p.d.f. of a particle's position. It can be found using the wave function


A lot of quantum mechanics is about finding the wave function for different stuff, for instance the electrons orbiting a nucleus, a particle in a potential well and so on. So how do we find this wave function?? Well like in classical physics it was necessary to solve Newton's 2nd law, it is necessary to solve Schrodinger Equation to find a wave function in quantum mechanics.


The Famous Schrodinger equation (in a simpler, time independent form):

So by solving this equation you can get the wave function. But it's enough for today. Next time we're gonna look at some simple solutions to the wave function and also something called De Broglie's wavelength. Thanks for reading!



You might want to check out this:



 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Lady Gaga, Salman Khan